The unknown soldier book to read online. Unknown Soldier

Sections: Literature

Lesson Objectives:

  • get to know the personality of the writer,
  • try to understand the psychological, moral motives of the behavior of people of different generations in the distant war years,
  • talk about the changes in the character of the protagonist that occur in the process of searching,
  • to establish what reality forms in him the citizenship of thoughts and actions.

Decor:

  • book exhibition,
  • writer portrait,
  • candles,
  • protagonist poster,
  • poster with questions for debate.

Epigraph:

I know it’s not my fault that the others didn’t come from the war, that they, some older, some younger, stayed there, and it’s not about the same thing, that I couldn’t, I couldn’t save them, it’s not about that, but still, still, still...

A. Tvardovsky.

During the classes

Introductory speech of the teacher (Against the background of Mozart's music "Requiem". Candles are burning on the desks).

War... The worst thing is war. The most impossible thing is war. The most unthinkable is war.

When we pronounce this word, the heart shrinks from pain and horror. How many tears have been shed, destinies have been distorted, how many orphans and unborn children. Our land is richly watered with blood. When evening falls and twilight gathers over the Russian villages, the heart can see them. They tread lightly on their native land. Dead but alive. And a quiet melodic ringing is heard. And candles burn in their hands. They seem to say: “People, remember us!” Everlasting memory!

With these words, I would like to invite you to a wonderful meeting with the smart, kind, wonderful book by A. Rybakov “The Unknown Soldier”.

(I tell the topic and objectives of the lesson).

Open your notebooks and write down the topic of the lesson. Who is the author of the story "The Unknown Soldier"?

Two students tell the biography of A. Rybakov.

Teacher: The story "The Unknown Soldier" is the third book about Sergei Krasheninnikov, which make up the trilogy. Check out the book exhibition. I recommend that you contact the library and read other equally interesting works by A. Rybakov.

Trilogy- This is a literary work, consisting of three independent works, united into one whole by a common ideological concept, plot, main characters.

Well, now let's get straight to the story.

1) Did you like the story? Was it easy to read?

2) How is the story structured? What is its composition? (There are 2 plots in the story: 1) the usual everyday life of a construction team - this plot is conducted on behalf of Krosh;

2) a long-gone war invades peaceful life. Such a composition helps the author to more clearly show the connection between the past and the present.)

4) How does this event help the author merge the two plots into a single whole? (Both plots develop independently and seem to be independent of each other, but still we see a connection between these plots. Workers find a grave and, looking for the name of an unknown soldier, Sergei Krasheninnikov, and together with him we learn about five brave soldiers and about the feat of Dmitry Bokarev. The main event - finding the grave reveals the connection between the past and the present, helps to understand how generations of people are connected, shows the direct connection of the past war with modern civilian life. The search for the name of the unknown soldier merges two narratives into one.)

Teacher: The author wanted to say that the search for the names of the dead is necessary, they are necessary not only for relatives, but for all of us. There are no nameless soldiers, each of them has a name, and it must be found. The way Sergey Krasheninnikov did it.

5) How did Krosh get involved in the construction of the highway? Who gave him advice? (Didn't go to university, grandfather.)

6) How did Krosh react at first to the order to find out something about the unknown soldier? (He didn't like it)

7) Compare the thoughts and feelings of Krosh in chapters 6, 10, 26. (There is a desire to find out the name of the unknown soldier, Krosh wants to finish the job. And in the same chapter there is a dispute between Krosh and his fellow workers about whether to find out the name of the soldier. Krosh beats a man for the first time in his life.)

8) So why did Krosh decide to complete his search, although no one demanded this from him?

9) What does Sofya Pavlovna, the woman who went to the grave and looked after her, tell Krosh about the grave of Smirnova?

10) Remember Krosh's meeting with Natasha, who shows the documents left over from the deceased soldier. What are these documents? Did they help in establishing the name of the unknown soldier? (Photographs, a blotter, a pouch with the letter “K” embroidered on it, a lighter from a cartridge, a square from a children's lotto with a picture of a duck.)

11) What other actions does Krosh take to establish the name of the unknown soldier? (Request to the military archive).

12) Who is he dating? (With Mikheev and the Agapovs, he meets with Deputy Minister Struchkov, who got a list of all five soldiers. But first of all, Krosh enters the Alexander Garden and sees an eternal flame on the grave of an unknown soldier. And even more he wants to know the name of the soldier whose grave the builders found).

- Read the scene of Krosh's conversation with the Agapovs by roles.

Teacher: Krosh establishes in a long and complicated way that the soldier Krayushkin is buried in the grave. But the chairman of the village council already informs the mother of foreman Bokarev that the grave of her son has been found. And Krosh faced a serious task - to tell Bokarev's mother that it was not her son who was buried in the grave.

- We stage the scene of Krosh's conversation with Bokarev's mother.

- I ask the first question of the debate. To do this, I turn to the poster, on which the questions for the debate are written./ Attachment 1/

13) Was Sergei Krasheninnikov right that he did not tell the truth to Bokarev's mother? How do you think? What would you do in this situation? I would like you to discuss this issue.

Teacher: I also think that Sergey is right. This is a lie, of course. But, obviously, the same “holy” lie, which is sometimes very necessary for a person. Antonina Vasilievna Bokareva saw the meaning of her life in being close to her son - his grave. And to take away this grave from her is to take away her life. Antonina Vasilievna's words about her son echo Nekrasov's poem, which is read by grandfather Krosha.

The student reads a poem by Nekrasov:

Among our hypocritical deeds
And all the vulgarity and prose
I saw some tears
Holy, sincere tears.
Those are the tears of poor mothers,
They can't forget their children
Those who died in the bloody field,
How not to understand the weeping willow

Of their drooping branches. 14) But does A. Rybakov pose this question only in his book? And is this the main question? Remember what Krosh constantly thinks about? (The book raises the question of what we are worth, are we worthy of those who died. The author wants to show how the new generation of people has grown up. And we see that Sergey Krasheninnikov is worthy to continue the work of his fathers. Krayushkin and his comrades, if they had survived, were proud would them.)

15) Do you remember how the people around Sergei first reacted to his search? (Many people are involved in the search. These are different people: the old man Meheev, the journalist Agapov, grandfather Krosh, Deputy Minister Struchkov. And they reacted differently to the search for Krosh. Voronov believes that this is none of their business, he is trying to convince them to stop searching. Many comrades at work, they are also distrustful of his undertaking, and only the grandfather approves of the difficult task that the grandson undertook.)

16) How is the attitude of the surrounding people gradually changing towards Krosh's undertaking? (Gradually, step by step, Sergey convinces people of the need to search. The wall of distrust is crumbling, and now Voronov himself offers Krosh to take a vacation to go to Krasnoyarsk to Bokarev's mother, and his comrades offer money for the trip.)

Teacher: And in this universal approval of Sergey's searches, the malicious fear of Mekheev, who essentially put to death one of the soldiers - Vakulin, and Agapov's bragging, who took up the search for selfish purposes, and the indifference of the son of the deceased soldier Krayushkin, go into the shadows. All these people both argue and reconcile, but open up to themselves as soon as the question of a soldier's grave comes up, and they already begin to measure themselves and others by the measure of the highest civil morality. People look at themselves as if from the outside, weigh themselves on the scales of purity and truth. They become better, kinder, more mature, as happened with Krosh and Zoya, Krayushkin's granddaughter.

17) So, how do we see Krosh, the main character of the story? Give him a description. Then I open the poster on the board, and everyone is convinced of the correctness of their answers. (Attachment 1.)

Teacher: Write down the characteristics of Sergei Krasheninnikov in your notebook.

The second question of the debate. I turn to the board.(Attachment 1)

18) Are there people like Sergei Krasheninnikov among us?

19) So what is A. Rybakov's book about? (About our contemporary, a young man just entering life, taking an exam for civil maturity.)

Teacher: We see that in the complex process of searching for the meaning of life, Krosh becomes a citizen, Sergei Krasheninnikov, and comes to the conclusion that one must be a searching, active person and not forget the terrible years of the distant war.

The third question of the dispute. I turn to the board. (Attachment 1)

20) Do we need books about the war? Is A. Rybakov's book relevant today? (We are talking about the wars of our time, about the fact that in our time soldiers go missing.)

Ringing of bells.

The teacher reads the epigraph - the words of A. Tvardovsky.

What is A. Tvardovsky talking about? (About memory.)

The teacher reads an excerpt from R. Rozhdestvensky's poem "Requiem".

Remember!
Through the centuries, through the years
Remember!
About those who will never come again
Remember!
Do not cry, hold back moans in your throat,
Bitter moans.
Be worthy of the memory of the fallen
really worthy!
Bread and song, dream and poetry,
spacious life,
Every second, every breath
Be worthy!
People! As long as hearts are beating
Remember!

At what cost is happiness won, please remember!

Discussion questions:

  1. Was Krosh right that he did not tell the truth to the mother of foreman Bokarev? What would you do in this situation?
  2. Are there people like Sergey Krasheninnikov among us?
  3. Do we need books about the war? Is Anatoly Rybakov's book relevant today?

The bulldozer was standing in front of a small mound of grass. A low, half-rotted picket fence lay around.

Sidorov picked up a faded wooden star from the grass. The soldier's grave - apparently, remained from the war. It was dug away from the old road. But, laying a new one, we straightened the highway. And Andrey's bulldozer stumbled upon the grave.

Andrei got into the cab, turned on the levers, the knife advanced on the mound.

- What are you doing? - Sidorov stood on the mound.

- What, - Andrey answered, - I will level ...

- I will equalize you! Sidorov said.

- The difference to you where it will lie: above the road, under the road? asked the driver Yura.

“You didn’t lie in the ground, but I lay, maybe next to him,” said Sidorov.

At this time, another truck pulled up. Voronov came out of it, approached us, and frowned:

- Are we standing?

His gaze rested on the grave, on the picket fence; someone had already piled it up and put a faded star on top. Displeasure was reflected on Voronov's face, he did not like delays, and a grave on the road is a delay. And he looked at us with displeasure, as if we were to blame for the fact that this is where the soldier was buried.

Then he said to Andrew:

- Go around this place. Tomorrow I will send diggers to move the grave.

Silent all the time, Sidorov remarked:

- You can see from the fence and the star that someone was courting, it would be necessary to find the owner.

- We will not transfer to Kamchatka. The owner will come and find it. Yes, and there is no owner - everything rotted, - answered Voronov.

“He may have documents or some material evidence with him,” Sidorov insisted.

And Voronov gave in. For which, of course, Sidorov will have to pay later. Then. Until then I paid.

- Krasheninnikov! Go to the city, ask around, whose grave.

I was amazed by this command:

- Who am I going to ask?

- From whom - from local residents.

- Why me?

Because you are local.

- I'm not from here.

- It doesn't matter, you have a grandfather, a grandmother here ...

“I don’t have a grandmother, she died,” I answered gloomily.

“Moreover, old people,” Voronov continued with strange logic. “The whole city is here,” he showed the tip of his nail, “three streets ... If you find the owner, ask: let them take the grave, what is needed, we will help, we will transport it, but if you don’t find the owner, go to the military enlistment office in the morning: they say, they stumbled upon the grave, let them send representative for opening and transfer. Understood? - He turned to Yura: - Take him to the quarry, and then it will come.

- Who will work for me? I asked.

“We’ll find a replacement for your qualifications,” Voronov replied mockingly.

Such a boor!

- Let's go! Yura said.

... On the second run, the plane fired a machine-gun burst on a low-level flight and disappeared again, leaving behind a long, slowly and obliquely bluish stripe of smoke sliding towards the ground.

Sergeant Major Bokarev got up, shook off the ground, pulled up his tunic from behind, straightened the wide commander's belt and belt, turned the medal "For Courage" on the front side and looked at the road.

The cars - two ZISs and three GAZ-AA lorries - stood in the same place, on a country road, alone among the unharvested fields.

Then Vakulin got up, looked cautiously at the autumn but clear sky, and his thin, youthful, still quite boyish face expressed bewilderment: had death just flown over them twice?

Krayushkin also got up, brushed himself off, wiped his rifle—a neat, seasoned, elderly soldier.

Parting the tall, crumbling wheat, Bokarev went deep into the field, looked around frowningly, and finally saw Lykov and Ogorodnikov. They were still lying flat on the ground.

- How long are we going to stay?

Lykov turned his head, squinted at the foreman, then looked at the sky, got up, holding a rifle in his hands - a small, round, muzzy soldier, - he said philosophically:

“According to strategy and tactics, he shouldn't fly in here.

“Strategy… tactics… Straighten your tunic, Private Lykov!”

- Gymnastics - it's possible. - Lykov removed and tightened the belt.

Ogorodnikov also got up - a sedate, imposing driver with a belly, took off his cap, wiped his balding head with a handkerchief, remarked peevishly:

- That's what the war is for, so that the planes fly and shoot. Moreover, we go without disguise. Disorder.

This reproach was addressed to Bokarev. But the foreman's face was impenetrable.

“You talk a lot, Private Ogorodnikov!” Where is your rifle?

- In the cockpit.

- Dropped the weapon. The soldier is called! For such cases - the tribunal.

"That's known," snapped Ogorodnikov.

- Go to the cars! Bokarev ordered.

Everyone went out onto an empty country road to their old, battered cars - two ZISs and three lorries.

Standing on the bandwagon, Lykov announced:

- I flashed the cabin, you bastard!

“He was chasing you on purpose, Lykov,” Krayushkin remarked good-naturedly. - “Who, thinks, is Lykov here? ..” But Lykov evon crawled away ...

“He didn’t crawl away, but spread out,” Lykov joked.

Bokarev looked gloomily as Ogorodnikov covered the cabin and body with a felled tree. Wants to prove it!

- By cars! Interval fifty meters! Keep!

Five kilometers later they turned off the country road and, crushing small bushes, drove into a young birch forest. A wooden arrow nailed to a tree with the inscription "Struchkov's farm" pointed to the low buildings of the abandoned MTS, pressed against the slope.

- Prepare cars for delivery! Bokarev ordered.

He took out a shoe brush and velvet from under the seat and began polishing his chrome boots.

- Comrade foreman! Lykov turned to him.

- What do you want?

- So what?

- There is a food station in the city, I say ...

- You have been given a dry ration.

- What if they hadn't been released?

Bokarev finally realized what Lykov was hinting at, looked at him.

Lykov raised his finger.

- The city is still ... Koryukov is called. There is a female gender. Civilization.

Bokarev wrapped the brush and ointment in velvet and put it under the seat.

- You take on a lot, Private Lykov!

“I’m reporting the situation, comrade foreman.

Bokarev straightened his tunic, belt, belt, put his finger under the collar, twisted his neck.

- And without you there is someone to make a decision!

The usual picture of the PRB, known to Bokarev, is a marching and repair base, located this time in the evacuated MTS. The motor roars on the stand, the blowtorch hisses, the electric welding crackles; locksmiths in oiled overalls, under which tunics are visible, are repairing cars. The engine moves along the monorail; it is held by a locksmith; another, apparently a mechanic, directs the engine to the chassis.

The motor did not sit down, and the mechanic ordered Bokarev:

- Come on, foreman, hold on!

“He hasn’t started work yet,” Bokarev snapped. - Where is the commander?

What is your commander?

- What ... Commander of the PRB.

- Captain Struchkov?

- Captain Struchkov.

- I'm Captain Struchkov.

Bokarev was an experienced foreman. He could make a mistake, not recognizing the unit commander in the mechanics, but recognizing whether he is being played or not, he will not be mistaken here. He was not played.

- Sergeant Major Bokarev reports. Arrived from a separate autocompany of the 172nd Infantry Division. Delivered five cars for repair.

He famously applied, then threw his hand away from his cap.

Struchkov mockingly examined Bokarev from head to toe, grinned at his polished boots, his dandy appearance.

- Clean the cars of dirt so that they shine like your boots. Put it under a canopy and start disassembling.

- It is clear, comrade captain, it will be done! Allow me to make a request, Comrade Captain!

- What request?

- Comrade Captain! People from the front line, from day one. Let me go to the city, wash in the bathhouse, send letters, buy some little things. Tomorrow we will return, we will work - people are asking very much.

Yes, yes, please, we'll meet again. We have a lot to discuss. We must decide with the first book of Sovremennik. A historical fact for us - the first book of the publishing house.

Our business card. And the design, and the cover, and the print - all the very best. I have already spoken with Mikhalkov, Bondarev ... We decided: it will be Anatoly Rybakov's novel "Krosh's Notes" - you, of course, read ... And you, Valentin Vasilyevich? - turned to Sorokin.

No, I haven't read Rybakov. I don't have time for serious writers. Blinov interrupted the director: - Tonight we will meet in the main editorial office and decide. His face turned purple with excitement. He concluded in a firm voice:

But in general, Yuri Lvovich, we will agree right away: the selection of manuscripts and their preparation for publication is the business of the editors and the main editorial board. As for the first edition, I will offer a book by Mikhail Aleksandrovich Sholokhov. Maybe we should include his war stories in it.

This was Blinov's first action against Prokushev, Mikhalkov, Kachemasov and Yakovlev - Jewish gods who sought to start a publishing house created for Russian writers by publishing a book by a Jewish author, by the way vile and slanderous in content. With this courageous act of his, Andrei Dmitrievich sharply marked a crack in relations with the director, which will soon turn for him and for us, his deputies, into a deep, insurmountable ditch.

Yes, yes - of course, everything will be so, but you boldly come out from behind my back, fight with this devil - I'm already tired of him, he's starting to bother me.

They walked in silence for a minute. In the dining-room Andrei Dmitrievich continued:

Here is the first book. We have already decided, and the Committee agrees, - we are publishing Sholokhov's stories, and now he is again: "Let's start Krosh's Notes." I flared up: “Yes, how much can you! We have already decided, and everyone agrees, and the editor is already working, we have agreed with Sholokhov. Some obsession!”

Now the prose is your concern, connect quickly. I can't deal with him alone.

That day I got a call from the Union of Russian Writers - from Mikhalkov. An acquaintance from the institute called, a small man in the Union, but, apparently, at someone's prompt.

Congratulations on your appointment. All the new prose of Russian writers will now go through your hands. With whom did you decide to start? Whose book will be the first? - We decided the fate of the first book together: we will publish Sholokhov. And the design is already being prepared, the printing house has been determined ... - That's right, but you, old man, are the deputy chief and are responsible for everything there. - Yes, for what to answer? For Sholokhov? He is our first writer, who should we publish if not him?

The first is the first, but only your publishing house Sovremennik - this, after all, also says something. Should modern literature be published? And Sholokhov is good, of course, but this is a civil war.

Where are you heading? Are you advocating for Natan Rybakov? I tell you the issue is settled. Karelin gave good.

Well, okay, old man... You don't hear the conjuncture well. You need to look higher - not at Karelin. You are now out in the open. Here you will get a draft from all sides. Look, it wouldn't blow. I'm talking to you in a friendly way. And if you want to continue to inform you that here on Olympus they think what kind of winds blow, - keep quiet about our conversation. Keep it a secret, I'll be nice.

Anatoly Rybakov

UNKNOWN SOLDIER

As a child, every summer I went to the small town of Koryukov to visit my grandfather. We went with him to swim in Koryukovka, a narrow, fast and deep river three kilometers from the city. We undressed on a hillock covered with sparse, yellow, crushed grass. From the state farm stables came the tart, pleasant smell of horses. There was the sound of hooves on the wooden deck. Grandfather drove the horse into the water and swam beside him, grabbing the mane. His large head, with wet hair stuck together on his forehead, with a black gypsy beard, flickered in the white foam of a small breaker, next to a wildly squinting horse's eye. So, probably, the Pechenegs crossed the rivers.

I am the only grandson and my grandfather loves me. I love him very much too. He brought back good memories of my childhood. They still excite and touch me. Even now, when he touches me with his wide, strong hand, my heart aches.

I arrived in Koryukov on August 20, after the final exam. Got a four again. It became obvious that I would not go to university.

Grandfather was waiting for me on the platform. The same as I left it five years ago, when I was last in Koryukovo. His short, thick beard had gone a little gray, but his broad-cheeked face was still marbled white, and his brown eyes were as lively as ever. The same faded dark suit with trousers tucked into boots. He wore boots in both winter and summer. Once he taught me to put on footcloths. With a deft movement, he twisted the footcloth, admired his work. Pathom was pulling on his boot, grimacing not because the boot was tight, but from the pleasure that he sat so well on his leg.

Feeling like I was performing a comic circus act, I climbed onto the old cart. But no one on the forecourt paid any attention to us. Grandfather touched the reins in his hands. The horse, shaking its head, ran off at a brisk trot.

We drove along the new highway. At the entrance to Koryukov, the asphalt turned into the well-known cobbled pavement. According to grandfather, the city itself should pave the street, and the city has no funds.

What are our incomes? Previously, the tract passed, traded, the river was navigable - it became shallow. There is only one horse farm left. There are horses! There are world celebrities. But the city has little to gain from this.

My grandfather reacted philosophically to my failure at the university:

If you enter next year, if you don’t enter the next, you will enter after the army. And all things.

And I was saddened by the failure. Bad luck! "The Role of the Lyrical Landscape in the Works of Saltykov-Shchedrin". Topic! After listening to my answer, the examiner stared at me, waiting for the continuation. There was nothing for me to continue. I began to develop my own thoughts about Saltykov-Shchedrin. The examiner was not interested.

The same wooden houses with gardens and orchards, a small market on the square, a district consumer union store, a Baikal canteen, a school, the same centuries-old oaks along the street.

The only thing new was the motorway, which we again got on, leaving the city to the stud farm. Here it was still under construction. Hot asphalt was smoking; it was laid down by tanned guys in canvas mittens. Girls in T-shirts, headscarves pulled over their foreheads, scattered gravel. Bulldozers cut the ground with shiny knives. Buckets of excavators bit into the ground. Mighty machinery, rattling and clanging, advanced into space. There were residential trailers on the side of the road - evidence of camp life.

We handed over the britzka and the horse to the stud farm and went back along the bank of Koryukovka. I remember how proud I was when I crossed it for the first time. Now I would cross it with one push from the shore. And the wooden bridge, from which I once jumped with my heart beating with fear, hung over the water itself.

On the path, still hard as in summer, cracked in places by the heat, the first fallen leaves rustled underfoot. Sheaves turned yellow in the field, a grasshopper crackled, a lone tractor raised a chill.

Earlier, at this time, I was leaving my grandfather, and the sadness of parting was then mixed with the joyful expectation of Moscow. But now I just arrived, and I did not want to return.

I love my father and mother, I respect them. But something familiar broke, changed in the house, became annoying, even the little things. For example, mother's address to familiar women in the masculine gender: "dear" instead of "sweetheart", "dear" instead of "dear". There was something unnatural, pretentious about it. As well as the fact that she dyed her beautiful, black and gray hair in a reddish-bronze color. For what, for whom?

The first memorial in honor of the unknown soldier was built at the very beginning of the 1920s in France. In Paris, near the Arc de Triomphe, with all the proper military honors, the remains of one of the countless French infantrymen who remained lying on the fields of the First World War were buried. In the same place, at the monument, the Eternal Flame was lit for the first time. Soon after, similar burials appeared in the UK, near Westminster Abbey, and in the USA, at Arlington Cemetery. On the first of them were the words: "Soldier of the Great War, whose name is known to God." On the second, the memorial appeared only eleven years later, in 1932. It also read: "Here lies in honorable glory an American soldier whose name is known only to God."

The tradition of erecting a monument to a nameless hero could have arisen only in the era of the world wars of the twentieth century. In the previous century, with its cult of Napoleon and notions of war as an opportunity to show personal prowess, no one could have imagined that long-range artillery, heavy machine-gun fire, the use of poison gases and other modern means of warfare would make the very idea of individual heroism. New military doctrines operate with human masses, which means that the heroism of a new war can only be mass. As well as inextricably linked with the idea of ​​heroism, death is also massive.

By the way, in the USSR in the interwar decades, this was not yet understood, and the Eternal Flame in Paris was looked at with bewilderment, as a bourgeois whim. In the Land of Soviets itself, the mythology of the Civil War developed around heroes with big names and biographies - popular favorites, legendary army commanders and "people's marshals". Those of them who survived the period of repression in the Red Army in the mid-30s never learned to fight in a new way: Semyon Budyonny and Kliment Voroshilov could still personally lead the attack on the enemy (which Voroshilov, by the way, did during the fighting for Leningrad, having been wounded by the Germans and deserving of a contemptuous rebuke from Stalin), but they could not afford to abandon dashing cavalry attacks in favor of strategic maneuvering of masses of troops.

With arms held high

From the first days of the war, the Soviet propaganda machine spoke of the heroism of the Red Army units, valiantly holding back the advancing enemy. The version of why the German invasion achieved such amazing success in a matter of weeks was personally formulated by Comrade Stalin in his famous address to Soviet citizens on July 3, 1941: “Despite the fact that the best divisions of the enemy and the best parts of his aviation have already been defeated and found his grave on the battlefield, the enemy continues to climb forward, throwing new forces to the front. In Soviet historiography, the defeats and retreats of the Red Army in 1941-1942 were explained by anything: the unexpectedness of the strike, the superiority of the enemy in the number and quality of troops, his greater readiness for war, even the shortcomings of military planning on the part of the USSR, but not because actually took place, namely, the moral unpreparedness of the Red Army men and commanders for a war with Germany, for a new type of war.
We are embarrassed to write about the instability of our troops in the initial period of the war. And the troops ... not only retreated, but also fled, and fell into a panic.

G.K. Zhukov


Meanwhile, the unwillingness of Soviet citizens to fight was due to a whole range of reasons, both ideological and psychological. Units of the Wehrmacht, which crossed the state border of the USSR, rained down on Soviet cities and villages not only thousands of bombs and shells, but also a powerful information charge in order to discredit the existing political system in the country, to drive a wedge between state and party authorities and ordinary citizens. The efforts of Hitler's propagandists were by no means useless - a significant part of the inhabitants of our country, especially from among the peasants, representatives of national regions, only recently annexed to the USSR, in general, people who in one way or another suffered from the repressions of the 1920s and 1930s, did not see the point in to fight to the last "for the power of the Bolsheviks." It is no secret that the Germans, especially in the western regions of the country, were often indeed looked upon as liberators.
We made an analysis of losses during the retreat. Most fell on the missing, a smaller part - on the wounded and killed (mainly commanders, communists and Komsomol members). Based on the analysis of losses, we built party-political work in order to increase the stability of the division in defense. If in the days of the first week we allocated 6 hours for defense work and 2 hours for study, then in the following weeks the ratio was the opposite.

From the memoirs of General A.V. Gorbatov about the events of October-November 1941


An important role was played by reasons of a purely military nature, only connected, again, not with weapons, but with psychology. In the pre-war years, the Red Army men were trained for war in the old, linear manner - to advance in a chain, to hold the defense along the entire front line. Such tactics tied the soldier to his place in the general ranks, forced him to look up to his neighbors on the right and left, deprived him of an operational vision of the battlefield and even a hint of initiative. As a result, not just individual Red Army soldiers and junior commanders, but also commanders of divisions and armies, turned out to be completely helpless in the face of the new tactics of the Germans, who professed maneuver warfare, who knew how to assemble mobile mechanized units into a fist in order to dissect, surround and defeat masses of troops stretched into a line with relatively small forces. enemy.
Russian offensive tactics: a three-minute fire raid, then a pause, after which an infantry attack with a shout of “hurrah” in deep echeloned battle formations (up to 12 waves) without heavy weapons fire support, even in cases where attacks are made from long distances. Hence the incredibly large losses of the Russians.

From the diary of German General Franz Halder, July 1941


Therefore, units of the Red Army were able to offer serious resistance in the first months of the war only where positional - linear - tactics were dictated by the situation itself, primarily in the defense of large settlements and other strongholds - the Brest Fortress, Tallinn, Leningrad, Kyiv, Odessa, Smolensk, Sevastopol . In all other cases, where there was room for maneuver, the Nazis constantly "outplayed" the Soviet commanders. Left behind enemy lines, without communication with headquarters, without support from neighbors, the Red Army quickly lost the will to resist, fled or immediately surrendered - one by one, in groups and entire military formations, with weapons, banners and commanders ... So in the fall of 1941, after three or four months of fighting, the German armies found themselves at the walls of Moscow and Leningrad. A real threat of complete military defeat hung over the USSR.

Revolt of the masses

In this critical situation, three circumstances, closely related to each other, played a decisive role. Firstly, the German command, which was developing the plan for the eastern campaign, underestimated the scale of the task before it. Behind the shoulders of the Nazis already had the experience of conquering Western European countries in a matter of weeks, but a hundred kilometers along the roads of France and the same hundred kilometers along the Russian impassability are not at all the same thing, but from the then border of the USSR to Moscow, for example, there were 900 kilometers only in a straight line, not to mention the fact that constantly maneuvering armies had to cover much greater distances. All this had the most deplorable effect on the combat readiness of the German tank and motorized units, when they finally reached the distant approaches to Moscow. And if we consider that the Barbarossa plan provided for the delivery of full-scale strikes in three strategic directions at once, then there is nothing surprising in the fact that the Germans simply did not have enough strength in the fall of 1941 for the last decisive breakthrough on Moscow. Yes, and these hundreds of kilometers were by no means covered with fanfare - despite the catastrophic situation of the Soviet troops, the encirclement, "boilers", the death of entire divisions and even armies, the Headquarters each time managed to close the hastily restored front line in front of the Germans and introduce more and more new ones into battle and new people, including the people's militia, which is already completely incapable of combat. Actually, the mass heroism of the Red Army soldiers of this period consisted precisely in the fact that they took the fight in stunningly unequal, unfavorable conditions for themselves. And they died by the thousands, tens of thousands, but they helped buy the time the country needed to recover.
It is almost certain that no cultured Westerner will ever understand the character and soul of Russians. Knowledge of the Russian character can serve as a key to understanding the fighting qualities of a Russian soldier, his advantages and methods of his struggle on the battlefield ... You can never say in advance what a Russian will do: as a rule, he shied from one extreme to another. His nature is as unusual and complex as this vast and incomprehensible country itself. It is difficult to imagine the limits of his patience and endurance, he is unusually bold and courageous, and yet at times he shows cowardice. There were cases when the Russian units, selflessly repulsed all the attacks of the Germans, unexpectedly fled in front of small assault groups. Sometimes the Russian infantry battalions were confused after the first shots fired, and the next day the same units fought with fanatical stamina.

Secondly, the propaganda campaign of the Nazis in the East failed, because it came into conflict with the doctrine of the complete destruction of the "Slavic statehood" developed by them. It did not take long for the population of Ukraine, Belarus, the western regions of Russia and other republics that were part of the USSR to understand what kind of “new order” the invaders were bringing to them. Although cooperation with the Germans in the occupied territory took place, it did not become truly wide. And most importantly, with their unjustified cruelty towards prisoners of war and the civilian population, with their barbaric methods of warfare, the Nazis provoked a massive response from the Soviet people, in which anger and fierce hatred prevailed. What Stalin could not do at first, Hitler did - he made the citizens of the USSR realize what was happening not as a confrontation between two political systems, but as a sacred struggle for the right of their fatherland to life, forced the soldiers of the Red Army to fight not for fear, but for conscience. The massive feeling of fear, mass panic and confusion that helped the Nazis in the first months of the war, by the winter of 1941, turned into a readiness for mass heroism and self-sacrifice.
To some extent, the high fighting qualities of the Russians are reduced by their slow-wittedness and natural laziness. However, during the war, the Russians were constantly improving, and their senior commanders and headquarters received a lot of useful things by studying the experience of the combat operations of their troops and the German army ... The commanders of the junior and often the middle level still suffered from sluggishness and inability to make independent decisions - due to severe disciplinary sanctions they were afraid to take responsibility ... The herd instinct among soldiers is so great that an individual fighter always strives to merge with the "crowd". Russian soldiers and junior commanders instinctively knew that if they were left to their own devices, they would perish. In this instinct one can see the roots of both panic and the greatest heroism and self-sacrifice.

Friedrich Wilhelm von Mellenthin, "Tank Battles 1939-1945"


And thirdly, in these incredibly difficult conditions, Soviet military leaders found the strength to resist general confusion and panic, constant pressure from the Headquarters, and begin to master the basics of military science, buried under a pile of political slogans and party directives. It was necessary to start almost from scratch - from the abandonment of linear defense tactics, from unprepared counterattacks and offensives, from the tactically incorrect use of infantry and tanks for broad frontal strikes. Even in the most difficult situations, there were generals, such as the commander of the 5th Army, M.I. Potapov, who led the defensive battles in Ukraine, or the commander of the 19th Army, M.F. Lukin, who fought near Smolensk and near Vyazma, who managed to gather around him everyone who could really fight, organize knots of meaningful opposition to the enemy. Both of the mentioned generals were captured by the Germans in the same 1941, but there were others - K.K. Rokossovsky, M.E. Katukov, I.S. Konev, finally, G.K. Zhukov, who carried out the first successful offensive operation near Yelnya, and later stopped the Germans, first near Leningrad, and then near Moscow. It was they who managed to reorganize in the course of the battles, inspire those around them with the idea of ​​the need to apply new tactics, give the accumulated mass anger of the Red Army fighters the form of thoughtful, effective military strikes.

The rest was a matter of time. As soon as the moral factor came into play, as soon as the Red Army got a taste of the first victories, the fate of Nazi Germany was sealed. Undoubtedly, the Soviet troops still had to learn many bitter lessons from the enemy, but the advantage in manpower, as well as a meaningful readiness to fight, gave the mass heroism of the Red Army and Red Navy a different character compared to the first stage of the war. Now they were driven not by despair, but by faith in a future victory.

Heroes with a name

Against the backdrop of the mass death of hundreds of thousands and even millions of people, many of whom remain nameless to this day, several surnames stand out that have become truly legendary. We are talking about heroes whose exploits became famous throughout the country during the war years and whose fame in the post-war period was truly nationwide. Monuments and memorial complexes were erected in their honor. Streets and squares, mines and steamships, military units and pioneer squads were named after them. They composed songs and made films about them. For fifty years, their images have managed to acquire a real monumentality, with which even the “revealing” publications in the press, a whole wave of which surged in the early 1990s, could not do anything.

One can doubt the official Soviet version of the events of the history of the Great Patriotic War. We can consider the level of training of our pilots in 1941 to be so low that supposedly nothing more worthwhile than a ground ramming of a cluster of enemy troops could have come out of them. It can be assumed that Soviet saboteurs operating in the near German rear in the winter of 1941 were caught not by Wehrmacht soldiers, but by local peasants who collaborated with them. One can argue to the point of hoarseness what happens to the human body when it leans on a firing heavy machine gun. But one thing is clear - the names of Nikolai Gastello, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya, Alexander Matrosov and others would never have taken root in the mass consciousness of Soviet people (especially those who themselves went through the war), if they did not embody something very important - perhaps exactly what helped the Red Army withstand the onslaught of the Nazis in 1941 and 1942 and reach Berlin in 1945.

Captain Nicholas Gastello died on the fifth day of the war. His feat became the personification of that critical situation when the enemy had to be fought with any means at hand, in the face of his overwhelming technical superiority. Gastello served in bomber aviation, participated in the battles at Khalkhin Gol and in the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-1940. He made his first flight during the Great Patriotic War on June 22 at 5 am. His regiment suffered very heavy losses in the very first hours, and already on June 24 the remaining aircraft and crews were reduced to two squadrons. Gastello became the commander of the second of them. On June 26, his plane, as part of a link of three cars, took off to strike at a concentration of German troops advancing on Minsk. Having bombed along the highway, the planes turned east. At this moment, Gastello decided to shoot a column of German troops moving along a country road. During the attack, his plane was shot down, and the captain decided to ram the ground targets. His entire crew died with him: Lieutenants A.A. Burdenyuk, G.N. Skorobogaty, senior sergeant A.A. Kalinin.

A month after his death, Captain Nikolai Frantsevich Gastello, born in 1908, commander of the 2nd Aviation Squadron of the 42nd Long-Range Bomber Aviation Division of the 3rd Bomber Aviation Corps of the Long-Range Bomber Aviation, was posthumously awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union and awarded the Gold Star and the Order of Lenin . Its crew members were awarded the Order of the Patriotic War, 1st class. It is believed that during the years of the Great Patriotic War Gastello's feat was repeated by many Soviet pilots.

About martyrdom of Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya became known in January 1942 from the publication of the military correspondent of the newspaper Pravda, Pyotr Lidov, under the name "Tanya". In the article itself, Zoya's name has not yet been called, it was established later. It was also later found out that in November 1941, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya, as part of a group, was sent to the Vereisky district of the Moscow region, where German units were stationed. Zoya, contrary to popular belief, was not a partisan, but served in military unit 9903, which organized the sending of saboteurs behind enemy lines. In the last days of November, Zoya was captured while trying to set fire to buildings in the village of Petrishchevo. According to some sources, she was noticed by a sentry, according to others, a member of her group, Vasily Klubkov, who was also captured by the Germans shortly before, betrayed her. During interrogation, she called herself Tanya and completely denied her belonging to a sabotage detachment. The Germans beat her all night, and in the morning they hanged her in front of the villagers.

The feat of Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya became an expression of the highest resilience of the Soviet spirit. The eighteen-year-old girl did not die in the heat of battle, not surrounded by her comrades, and her death had no tactical significance for the success of the Soviet troops near Moscow. Zoya ended up in the territory captured by the enemy, and died at the hands of the executioners. But, having accepted a martyr's death, she won a moral victory over them. Zoya Anatolyevna Kosmodemyanskaya, born in 1923, was presented to the title of Hero of the Soviet Union on February 16, 1942. She became the first woman to receive a Gold Star during the Great Patriotic War.

Feat Alexandra Matrosova already symbolized something else - the desire to help comrades at the cost of life, to bring victory closer, which, after the defeat of the Nazi troops at Stalingrad, already seemed inevitable. Matrosov fought from November 1942 as part of the Kalinin Front, in the 2nd Separate Rifle Battalion of the 91st Separate Siberian Volunteer Brigade named after Stalin (later the 254th Guards Rifle Regiment of the 56th Guards Rifle Division). On February 27, 1943, the Matrosov battalion entered the battle near the village of Pleten in the Pskov region. The approaches to the village were covered by three German bunkers. The fighters managed to destroy two of them, but the machine gun installed in the third one did not allow the fighters to go on the attack. Sailors, having approached the bunker, tried to destroy the machine-gun crew with grenades, and when this failed, he closed the embrasure with his own body, allowing the Red Army soldiers to capture the village.

Alexander Matveyevich Matrosov, born in 1924, was presented to the title of Hero of the Soviet Union on June 19, 1943. His name was given to the 254th Guards Regiment, he himself is forever enlisted in the lists of the 1st company of this unit. The feat of Alexander Matrosov for propaganda purposes was dated for February 23, 1943. It is believed that Matrosov was not the first soldier of the Red Army to cover a machine-gun embrasure with his chest, and after his death, about 300 more soldiers repeated the same feat, whose names were not so widely known.

On the December days of 1966, in honor of the 25th anniversary of the defeat of German troops near Moscow, the ashes of the Unknown Soldier, delivered from the 41st kilometer of the Leningrad Highway, were solemnly buried in the Alexander Garden near the walls of the Kremlin, where in 1941 there were especially fierce battles for the capital.


On the eve of the celebration of the 22nd anniversary of the Victory, on May 8, 1967, the architectural ensemble "Tomb of the Unknown Soldier" was opened at the burial site. The authors of the project are architects D.I. Burdin, V.A. Klimov, Yu.A. Rabaev, sculptor - N.V. Tomsk. The center of the ensemble is a bronze star, placed in the middle of a mirror-polished black square, framed by a platform of red granite. The Eternal Flame of Glory bursts out of the star, delivered to Moscow from Leningrad, where it was lit from a flame blazing on the Field of Mars.

On the granite wall is engraved the inscription “To those who fell for the Motherland. 1941-1945". On the right, along the Kremlin wall, blocks of dark red porphyry are lined up, under which earth is stored in urns, delivered from the hero cities - Leningrad, Kyiv, Minsk, Volgograd, Sevastopol, Odessa, Kerch, Novorossiysk, Murmansk, Tula, Smolensk, and also from the Brest Fortress. Each block has the name of the city and a chased image of the Gold Star medal. The tombstone of the monument is crowned with a three-dimensional bronze emblem depicting a soldier's helmet, a battle banner and a laurel branch.

Words are engraved on the granite slab of the tombstone.

Similar posts