Energies are flooded. Uk-ra-day sun Solar arias
The most mysterious object in the solar system presents more and more surprises. A star called the Sun recently began a new 11-year cycle of activity, but it will not wake up. The activity of the luminary is a record low in the entire history of observations! Astronomers even began to talk: if this goes on, the Earth may lose a significant part of cosmic heat and a new Little Ice Age will begin.But now lovers of observations have sharply become not up to it. There was a bigger sensation. The US Space Agency (NASA) has launched a long-awaited new satellite to study the star. Soon, videos from this device appeared on the NASA website. Astronomers pounced on them - and were dumbfounded.
Some videos show how mysterious objects resembling huge spaceships fly up to the Sun from different directions. Some look like spindles, others look like giant crabs. Some of the unidentified objects seem to dive into the Sun, while others seem to jump out of it. The space agency declined to explain, but quickly retouched the sensational video.
Space secrets
The sensation did not appear out of nowhere. The fact is that only now earthlings were able to really look closely at the Sun. Whether due to fatal bad luck, roofing felts for other reasons, until recently there was suspiciously little information about him.
First of all, surprisingly, the largest object in the solar system is not at all spoiled by the attention of space agencies. Mars, the Moon, and even distant giant planets have received many more launches.
In the entire history of space flights, specialized satellites have been sent to the Sun - once or twice and miscalculated.
Although the Sun is full of mysteries. For example, no one knows where half of the neutrino flux disappears, which, according to all calculations, should emit a star. But it doesn't reach us. Also, no one knows why the south pole of the Sun is noticeably colder than the north. There is also the famous mystery of the solar corona - its temperature inexplicably increases with distance from the Sun by millions of degrees. What can I say, even if the nature of the famous sunspots and the reason for their especially rapid appearance every 11 years is a secret with seven seals.
Visitors from Jupiter
An example of an obvious mistake by amateur astronomers who have found UFOs in satellite images: the recent "Jovian sensation" that stirred up world news feeds. Astronomers participating in the radio search for extraterrestrial civilizations announced the following. While studying an interactive computer map of space, they discovered three giant unidentified objects in orbit around Jupiter, tens of kilometers long, moving towards Earth. According to calculations, the arrival of huge UFOs should occur in mid-December 2012. That is exactly when the end of the world comes according to the Mayan calendar.
As proof, astronomers cited UFO pictures - it was difficult to confuse them with something miraculous. In addition, they gave exact coordinates on the map - anyone could open it, find them, and see for themselves. Everything seems to be obvious, there is a sensation. Only later it turned out that the photographs of the sky with mysterious objects posted on the Internet were made back in the 1950s, and the mysterious ships were just defects that appeared when old films were converted to digital form.
Sunshine is enough. But the space agencies weren't too eager to get to them. What's more, the few pieces of equipment that got started were constantly plagued by astounding failures. The chain of almost mystical breakdowns began in 1980, when NASA launched the first ever specialized space probe for observations of the star, the Solar Maximum Mission, into low Earth orbit with great fanfare. It was stuffed to the limit with sensors in order to study the star closest to the Earth in all major radiation spectra. Less than a year later, a global electronics failure occurred on the satellite, and the expensive device turned into a pile of non-working iron.
The next victim of solar bad luck was the Japanese space agency. In 1991, it sent the Yoko Solar X-ray Observatory into orbit. After working for a while, the lab "snapped" without surviving the eclipse.
At the moment when the moon blocked the rays of the star, for some unknown reason, the satellite lost control, the equipment failed. Soon Yoko deorbited and burned up in the atmosphere.
But the biggest victim of the "solar curse" was a series of Russian devices "Koronas". Back in the early 1990s. The Russian Academy of Sciences has planned the launch of ten specialized solar satellites. In reality, only three were sent into orbit.
In 1994, the first apparatus, Koronas-I, was launched. It was designed for at least three years of work, but after a couple of months, the connection was suddenly interrupted for no apparent reason. When the signal was restored, it became clear that almost all scientific equipment was silent. Attempts to revive the electronics were unsuccessful.
The recent launch of the Koronas-Photon satellite turned out to be an even bigger failure. The launch took place from the Plesetsk cosmodrome in January 2009. "Photon" - a rather big apparatus weighing two tons - was intended to study the solar corona. Just a list of scientific institutions that created his many sensors, analyzers and spectrometers would take several pages. For example, the Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Lebedeva built for "Photon" a unique set of TE-SIS telescopes capable of seeing the Sun in the hard X-ray range. Petersburg Institute of Physics and Technology. Ioffe installed a KONUS-RF gamma spectrometer on the apparatus. The MEPhI Institute of Astrophysics donated the NATALIA-2M spectrometer to Photon.
third heavenly eye
The laboratories have been working on this equipment for many years. And all of it at the moment became a pile of dead microcircuits, sensors and wires. According to the official version, Coronas-Photon died due to a stupid miscalculation. It was not ultra-modern devices that failed at all, but two simple batteries. Already six days after the launch, a series of equipment failures that were inexplicable at first occurred on the Foton. Then there was a global power failure, then the connection was lost. Understood. It turned out that the power of the batteries was calculated incorrectly, it is not enough. Scientists waited: the instruments would come to life when the satellite entered the well-lit parts of the orbit and the solar panels saturate the batteries with energy. Hopes proved futile.
In general, after many years of leapfrog solar turmoil that haunted all the world's space agencies, only two efficient scientific apparatus remained in orbit, supplying at least some information about the star. This satellites are veterans of SOHO and "Stereo".
The first of them is a European-American apparatus weighing 1.85 tons. It started back in 1995 and has worked out all the deadlines for a long time. There were accidents at SOHO from the very beginning. In the summer of 1998, the satellite was lost - the connection disappeared. Contact was restored only in the fall. Then the gyroscope broke down, then, in 2003, the motor of the antenna transmitting information to Earth failed. Therefore, the data from him has since come with gulkin's nose. The second working satellite - "Stereo" - is a complex of two small probes. He went into orbit at the end of 2006, initially calculated for only three years of work. It has a very narrow task - to take stereoscopic pictures of the Sun.
Simply put, the Earth received far from as much information about the star as we would like. More precisely, almost nothing. Therefore, scientists have long demanded a new cosmic eye. They only received it in February 2010, when NASA launched the three-ton solar observatory SDO. Adjustment in orbit took almost a year, but now - for the first time in history - a huge stream of data about the Sun has gone to Earth. In one hour, SDO transmits more information than previous devices provided in many months.
It was in these myriad piles of new digital data that sensational records were discovered with dozens of "alien ships" diving into the depths of the star. Unlike the vast majority of other evidence of the existence of UFOs, the record has official status, the picture is quite clear. According to the video from the observatory, the size of some objects is slightly smaller than that of the moon. Officially, NASA does not explain anything; in informal conversations, agency employees talk about possible filming defects.
bright thoughts
On the other hand, not all suspicious space images and films can be explained by NASA's usual excuses about digital distortion, random glare, cloud shadows, etc. For example, to this day, the mysterious trace of an aircraft in the Martian sky remains a mystery, which accidentally fell into the frame of a video shot by an American rover. The footage is so obvious that NASA cannot deny the reality of the trail. But officially announced it as the trajectory of one of the terrestrial aircraft launched into the orbit of the Red Planet many years ago.
Since there are no terrestrial probes near the Sun, this time the space agency decided not to be smart, but simply erased suspicious objects on the video. Most likely they acted exactly according to the instructions. In the documents of the American space agency, they have long discovered a set of rules carefully drawn up by the secret services that prescribe to hide from the public materials that "may cause unnecessary noise." There are detailed recommendations on how to do this, what explanations to give to the media, how to mislead them. So the secrets of NASA are not fiction at all. Digging into space secrets has long been the professional occupation of hundreds of people, including the famous "Disclosure Group", which includes 200 people, including former NASA employees.
They have their own clear explanation of the sensational video. According to Einstein's theory, the Sun may be the site of a cluster of so-called wormholes in space-time. This is something like tunnels between distant points of the universe. There is nothing pseudo-scientific in this concept, it is quite consistent with the theories of physics. According to the "Revealing Group", aliens use the Sun as a staging post, a portal to other worlds. It is a kind of bus station of other civilizations. Hence the very intense traffic and diversity of spaceships observed in the video.
Whatever it is, one thing is clear. The sun itself - with or without aliens, wormholes - is the most mysterious object in our system. Nothing else has such a huge impact on the conditions of life on Earth. When last time there was the same low solar activity as in recent years, the Little Ice Age began in Europe. The sharp cooling lasted 70 years: from 1645 to 1715. There were severe colds, the rivers were covered with ice even in summer, due to crop failures, food prices rose 10 times. So it is impossible to overestimate our dependence on the luminary. So, studying it is a top priority.
"I showed that the Sun is not at all an ancient object in our sky, but, on the contrary, the youngest. After the article, discussions began on the sites that reposted it, which led to at least one very interesting discovery.
It turned out that the Sun was not recorded on any ancient and medieval canvas! For some unknown reason, this object did not find a place in any painting or lithography. Therefore, there is no evidence for the existence of the Sun.
Compare to today. As soon as a person acquires a camera, he immediately begins to take pictures of the world around him. There is no mention of any artistic value at first. A person carries out a simple fixation of the phenomena surrounding him, which seemed interesting to him. The most frequent object of such photographs is the Sun. This can be checked using any search engine. And against this background, it is completely incomprehensible why the ancient artists were not interested in the Sun and did not fix it on their canvases?
Moscow Kremlin, 1661.
Astrakhan, 1693.
Here is the 19th century.
View of the Neva from the Winter Palace. A. K. Beggrov, 1881
Another moment. There was such a device - "sundial". In various articles on this topic, their appearance is justified as follows: “ The appearance of these watches is associated with the moment when a person realized the relationship between the length and position of the sun's shadow from certain objects and the position of the Sun in the sky". This, of course, is not an explanation. Even a kitten, growing up, stops playing with the shadow - he realizes the connection between it and the sun. However, no cat has yet created a sundial.
Often, their invention is attributed to the "ancient Romans", "ancient Greeks", "ancient Egyptians" and, most ridiculously, to the "Arabs". For some reason, researchers studying this issue think that for the invention of a sundial, it is enough to see the shadow and be aware of it.
In fact, in order to invent a clock, one must first realize not the shadow, but the existence of TIME. Then get hold of MATH, and then develop a number system. Next, learn how to use geometry. And only after all this it will be possible to build a sundial. I'm not talking about the determinant of latitude - a necessary element of such watches.
Judging by the geographical maps, the concept of LATITUDE appears at the end of the 16th - beginning of the 17th century. Actually, since that time, the appearance of a sundial has become possible. There were seven sundials in Soviet museums. The earliest of them date back to 1556. They are kept in the Hermitage.
By design, these watches were designed to be worn around the neck. They are a horizontal sundial with a sector gnomon to indicate the time, a compass to orient the clock in the north-south direction, and a plumb line on the gnomon to give the clock a horizontal position. The listed elements are installed on the board. It can deviate from the horizontal position, making it possible to use the watch not at the same latitude, but in the range of 47 - 57 degrees.
In Italy, such clocks were also widely used from the 16th century. The Italian astronomer Giovanni Padovani published a Treatise on the Sundial around the same time, in 1570. This text included instructions for making vertical and horizontal sundials. Another Italian, Giuseppe Biancani, also discussed how to make a sundial around 1620.
On August 23, 1739, a Senate decree was issued obliging the installation of wooden milestones in the form of obelisks on the road from St. Petersburg to Peterhof. In 1744, a decree was issued on a similar blocking of the road from St. Petersburg to Tsarskoye Selo. Instead of milestones-obelisks, "marble pyramids" were subsequently placed. Some of them had sundials.
Such a “marble pyramid” with a sundial has been preserved in St. Petersburg at the corner of the Fontanka River embankment and Moskovsky Prospekt. It marks one verst from the Post Office building. Another "marble pyramid" (with the date "1775" applied to it) is in Pushkin - at the Oryol Gatelocated on the southern border of Catherine's Park.
Thus, the actual sundial can only be dated to 1556 or so. This just fits into our version, published in the book "Metaphysics of the Earth's Climate", and saying that the Sun appeared in the sky only in 1492. This phenomenon marked the end of the Old World and the beginning of the New World. Metaphorically, the beginning of the New World is called the "discovery of America." Since that time, the Renaissance began - XV - ¼ XVII centuries: 1499.4 - 1629.
Such conclusions and assumptions may seem strange and impossible, but there is another proof of the absence of the Sun in the early Middle Ages.
Recall that the birth of each new word always accompanies the phenomenon it denotes. For example, an airplane appeared, and the word “airplane” was born along with it. There are no words widely used in society that do not mean anything real. Conversely, there is no such environment that would not receive a verbal designation. For example, if there is a sea, then the word "sea" also exists.
So let's check the word "sun". To do this, we use two dictionaries. The first one is “Dictionary of birch bark letters of the XI-XII centuries” (compiled by A.A. Tyunyaev), the second, covering a later period, is “Materials for a dictionary of the ancient Russian language” (compiled by I.I. Sreznevsky, 1893).
The word "sun" is not recorded in the Dictionary of birch bark letters! And it is very doubtful that a person of the XI-XII centuries would not use the word "sun" in his lexicon, if it really existed. After all, there will always be a life situation that somehow turns out to be glued with the concept of the Sun.
For example, in Sreznevsky (1893) this word is already present and it is glued together with a number of relevant concepts from real life: “ SILNTSE, SLINTSE, SUN - the sun; SILNTSE, SLINTSE, SUN - an expression of peace treaties to determine their eternal inviolability; light; SULNTSEVIDNYI - with a brilliance similar to the sun; SЪLNTSEZARNYI - sunny; SILENTEOBRAZNYI - similar to the sun; SELNTSEPRѢVRATNIK - a member of the sect "solar-transformers"; SELNTSEPRѢLAYER, SELNITSEPRѢVRATNIKЪ - facing the sun; SHUN, SN, SH, SH— sunny; SOLNYCHNYI, SLONYCHNYI, SLONYCHNYI, SUNNY, SUNNY - sunny; shining; light coloured».
It is not clear to what time the appearance of the word "sun" refers. Sreznevsky is not tied to a specific date. But there is an interesting indication - the sect of "solar changers". A turncoat (the wrong word “gatekeeper” is used today) is one who opens and lets in, but not in the sense of “standing at the gate”, but in the sense of making a transformation. It is possible that this sect was talking about the transformation of the Sun in the Middle Ages.
Which is taught to us at school and at the institute, has nothing to do with reality. It was created by writers in the 19th and 20th centuries in order to form a false reality for enslaved peoples - so that slaves do not know and do not think about yesterday's lost freedom. The “official” history is based on medieval novels, in which the poor and miserable knights - RAMANs, or the Romans, the Romanovs, were sung, who in foreign lands were looking for rich brides to, having found, become ordinary gigolos.
Modern humanity is already sufficiently developed in order not to follow the medieval path - not to believe the annals and medieval clerks who composed "events" to order and to please their superiors from one or another.
Along with the revision of the concept of the cosmos and the concept of the "spherical" Earth, there is also a revision of the concept of human evolution. An increasing number of facts indicate that a person is a program and part of a certain computer game that the programmer made according to the principle of an aquarium. At one point, he formed all people of different ages and with their memories, added an environment to people, put the ruins of antiquity there himself, and then turned on the Sun.
It is interesting for a programmer to observe on our ludarium. He entertains himself by breeding people - just as we keep aquariums and terrariums in which the fish do not know where they came from, and meet together only at the moment the aquarium is settled. The ruins standing at the bottom tell the fish about ancient times, and we bought these ruins in the store.
Currently, many researchers have begun to actively study the real facts, which reveal a completely different story. Let me remind you the main milestones of the true history of the World:
- IX - XII centuries - the existence of the antediluvian civilization of Rus'.
- XIII - XV centuries - the flood.
- The end of the XV century - the beginning of the withdrawal of water.
- 1492 - the appearance of the Sun.
- The middle of the XVI century - the appearance of the first people.
- 1757 - the settlement of the Earth by people.
- 1857 - the beginning of the clone revolution.
- 1957 - the victory of the clones, the conquest of the Earth by clones.
Naturally, those who are supposed to know this know all this. That is why in our days there is a mass migration of people - they are preparing for climate change, which, in turn, will take place due to a change in the position of the Earth. Our planet is not a sphere or a ball. It is , and , which leads to climate change, and .
As for the physics of the Sun, here too much can become clear if one resorts to modern knowledge of physics. Is it possible for the sun to appear? Maybe. This happens in the following way. Vacuum ignites in some area, and a "white" hole is formed in it. It, using the proton-proton cycle, grows to the size of an ordinary star. We see it as the Sun.
The previous version of the Sun is the Moon. She is the Sun that shone and went out, that is, the Moon is the past Sun. After the star burns out, what remains of it is an iron-nickel shell. We see it on the Moon. Both objects are flat and located close to the Earth, within 6 thousand kilometers. These are physical explanations, which are confirmed by modern calculations and experiments.
But physics proceeds from what the observer sees. And he sees only what his own brain forms in the form of an image. That is, the observer sees images that can be shown to him in isolation from reality. So, for example, it happens during hypnosis, or during sleep, or during a mirage. But any image is always formed by one or another machine - a computer or a computer.
To create an image in the mind of the observer, you must first create this image programmatically. Let's go back to the circle example. Its form is the same throughout the universe - does anyone really think that it appeared by itself and everywhere? For example, the operator
Programming languages can be different. We humans have invented a language consisting of letters and numbers. And the one who created us uses the language of chemical elements. With a simple description, this language creates substances. With a little more complex - organic chemistry. During operations with organic bases, the DNA of humans and other creatures is programmed.
There is no fundamental difference between a computer and a person. There are discrepancies in the diet, production method, etc. But the architecture of a computer is completely identical to the architecture of a person. Moreover, the architecture of man is completely identical to the architecture of God. Recall the biblical: God created man in his own image and likeness.
And again, there are no miracles here. The image and likeness, as well as all algorithms, are formed on the same forms, which are the same for all types of entities - like the same circle, the same for the entire Universe.
And the last. Scientists involved in this area know what we are talking about. No wonder that in the fall of 2015 there were reports that. And in December of the same year, both, and were reported about the end of the world, or maybe the literal end of the Sun. Moreover, they referred to extraterrestrial forces, with which people, according to the queen, are unable to cope.
So this topic, the topic of the emergence and disappearance of the Sun, as well as the consequences of this, is very complex. It could be considered non-existent. But too many facts are being discovered lately...
Editor-in-chief of the newspaper "President",
K-Ra-Day Sun
I have two news for you: bad and terrible:
Not only is there no Moon, but the Sun has also been stolen. And don't say you haven't heard.
K.I. Chukovsky, back in the last century, shouted about this from every book counter, but you decided that the man just composed a rhyme. No, not easy! He was forced to hide SUCH in a nursery rhyme - so he avoided the madhouse. You were clearly told: "The crocodile swallowed our Sun," and you sat and clapped your ears. Here is the Sun and slapped!
Nobody stole anything, the sun rises every morning! - you will object, but you will be bitterly mistaken.
Has it ever crossed your mind, what for is this extra, unnecessary and unpronounceable letter "L" in the middle of a word? We clearly speak to the Sun! Son-tse! This is a dream! Yes, stop! That is, the SUN=IS A DREAM? What other dream? And who inserted this letter "L" in order to distort the image? Apparently the one who stole the sun, that is, a crocodile, or a reptile in other words. You will say that I am paranoid, but that's bad luck - Belarusians and Ukrainians write like that: Sunshine!
And now let's translate the nursery rhyme into the language of adults: the reptiles closed our luminary, and in return they turned on some kind of surrogate lantern of such a strange action that people fell into a specific state, which they began to call "This dream." It turns out that the Sun is not a fiery disk, but the name of this whole scam, as a result of which the true source of light and heat was closed, a substitute lantern was screwed up, and people fell into hibernation. If the Sun is not the name of a lantern, then what was the name of the ancestors?
We remember fairy tales. There is no sun there! But there is Yarilo! That is what the ancestors called their new lantern. In Dahl's dictionary, Yarilo means heat, burning fire. Apparently, the ancestors alternated pronunciation: either Yarilo or ZharIlo. Thus, Yarilo is a new, unusually hot, blinding and burning lantern, and the Sun is an illusory world into which the people have been immersed. Over time, the creatures merged these two concepts together: Yarilo-Sun - this is how this dish was prepared!
And now a logical question arises: what was the name of our true luminary, which was swallowed by a crocodile? We find the answer in the rock art of the ancients, where a scratched circle with rays is strangely signed: "Solar" - that's it, the name of our luminary! Funny coincidence: "Sol" from English. - soul (soul). Thus, Sol-Ar is the Soul of the Aryans, and not just a luminous core in the center of the Earth. Solar - this is God, Guardian Angel, egregor, collective mind, protector and patron of the Aryans in one person. As long as the Solar shines, the Aryans are invincible!
Summarize. Yarilo, Sunny, Solarium - seemingly synonyms from the same test, but now we know that these are completely different words. Let's pay tribute to the creatures: they merged not two concepts, but three!
Solar is the true, living luminary-core of our planet, which is now covered by a certain sphere with drawn stars and planets from papier-mâché.
Yarilo is a burning and blinding artificial lamp, the disk of which we see in the sky. Keyword: DISK(!!!), not a sphere.
The sun is not an object, it is a state of trance into which Yarilo drives. That is why our sensitivity to the subtle world is sharpened at night. We (especially children) always see something in the dark - and we are afraid. We are afraid, because we are not familiar with and are not ready for the subtle worlds, because we sleep in a narcotic dream from birth to death, which we also fear more than anything else.
Why did it take to remake the world on such a breathtaking scale? But why:
The soul is eternal (although this, fortunately, is not disputed), and in order for it to evolve, the eternal soul also needs an eternal body - HUMAN. Otherwise, this is aimless walking in circles, stepping on the same rake. If the bodies do not grow old, then they do not die, therefore they must live in a NON-CYCLICAL world. This is a world where there is no change of day and night, summer and winter, death and birth. No carousel, just moving forward!
Our Earth was just like that. To make it easier to understand, imagine a slice of a chicken egg.
A strong shell is a shell of the planet for protection from "space".
The next layer under the shell is a white film - land and oceans.
In the very center - the yolk - this is the Solar core, a giant Luminary, warm and gentle, and not burning and blinding.
The main% of the volume of the egg is protein - between the white film and the yolk - this is the biosphere of the planet.
A cord passes through the protein from the shell to the yolk - this is the Tree of Life - the connection of the periphery with the center. This is a giant oak, which was told by A.S. Pushkin, and the film "Avatar" told how the creatures got rid of him.
It used to be a different world. The whole space from the land / ocean to the Solar was simply teeming with life. This is evidenced by the snow caps of the mountains and the ice of the poles, in which water is concentrated - the basis of living organisms, which the grays destroyed in one fell swoop. Judging by the volume of snow, 1/20,000 of the trees, fish, animals and people now live on Earth. Just think about it: before the catastrophe, the planet's biosphere was denser TWENTY THOUSAND TIMES!!! Modern forests 30 meters high are just miserable bushes compared to the fabulous forests of the Aryans.
Who thinks what? Does it resonate?
Image copyright PA Image caption Scholz's star invaded the Oort cloud - the outer spherical part of the solar system
Relatively recently, by astronomical standards - about 70 thousand years ago, another star invaded the boundaries of the solar system, astronomers believe.
A team of researchers from the US, Europe, Chile and South Africa say it was five times closer to Earth than our current closest neighbor, Proxima Centauri.
The celestial body in question is Scholz's star, classified as a red dwarf. It passed through the outer part of the solar system, known as the Oort cloud.
This star was first identified as belonging to the class closest to the Sun by the German astronomer Ralf-Dieter Scholz in 2013.
Scholz's star in the Oort cloud was not alone. She was accompanied on her journey by a brown dwarf. So called substars, in which thermonuclear reactions stop, turning them into planet-like bodies.
Thanks to observations of the trajectory of the star, it became clear that 70 thousand years ago this space voyager flew past the Sun at a distance of 0.8 light years.
To date, this is the closest recorded approach of the solar system with another star.
For comparison, the distance to the nearest star to the solar system, Proxima Centauri from the constellation Alpha Centauri, is 4.2 light years.
98% sure
Today, Scholz's star is already at a distance of 20 light years from us.
As a group of astrophysicists led by Eric Mamazek from New York University of Rochester writes in the article, they are 98% sure that Scholz's star passed through the Oort cloud.
The Oort cloud is a hypothetical region of the solar system, the existence of which has not been confirmed instrumentally, but many indirect facts indicate its existence.
Image caption The effect of a star passing through the solar system depends on its speed, mass and trajectoryScientists believe that this is a region on the outskirts of the solar system, replete with comets with a diameter of more than 1.5 km. This zone is a kind of spherical shell of the solar system, which extends deep into space to a distance of up to 100,000 AU. (AU or astronomical unit is the average distance from the Earth to the Sun).
Due to the fact that Scholz's star passed only through the outer part of the Oort cloud, it did not cause an active migration of objects, including to the inner regions of the solar system.
It is expected that we will be able to observe the consequences of displacements of the trajectories of celestial bodies in this cloud in the form of the appearance of new long-period comets only after 2 million years.
Scientists, studying the dynamics of the movement of Scholz's star, for a long time could not determine whether it was approaching the solar system or moving away from it.
But measurements of its radial and tangential velocities showed that the star is moving away from the Earth, although it was relatively recently next to it.
Scholz's Star is the first luminary, apart from the Sun, that was once so close to the Earth.
According to scientists, their computer simulation of the movement of about ten thousand known stars with a probability of 98 percent showed that only one star could fall within the Oort cloud.
Astronomers are going to continue searching for other such stars using the European Space Agency's Gaia space telescope.
Minimal effect
A star passing through the Oort cloud has the potential to cause gravitational chaos in the solar system and turn the many comets that are here towards the center of the system.
But Eric Mamasek believes that the effect of Scholz's star visiting the solar system was minimal.
Image copyright AP Image caption As scientists suggest, our distant ancestors could see Scholz's star passing through the Oort cloud.“There are trillions of comets in the Oort cloud, and it is likely that some of them were disturbed by this object,” he told the BBC. “But so far it seems unlikely that this star has caused a powerful comet shower.”
The effect of a star passing through the Oort cloud is determined by its speed, mass, and how deep it has gone.
The worst-case scenario is a slow-moving, massive star that would come close to the Sun.
Scholz's star came relatively close, but its mass, like that of its brown dwarf companion, was small, and they flew fast. This explains why the solar system got off with a "light fright" as a result of the visit of these guests.
Nevertheless, according to one theory, having invaded the Oort cloud, Scholz's star could significantly increase its brightness, and our distant ancestors 70 thousand years ago could well observe it for some time.
Photovoltaics love to compare how much energy falls on the ground and how much civilization consumes. Usually some square in sugar comes out ... But they also forget this option: you can create "sugar" anywhere in the world!So, another article from the brilliant journal "Science and Life" for 1976 No. 7:
Space and Energy
A. Vladimov.
With the beginning of the space age, ideas about our planet began to change rapidly. Seeing it in photographs taken from space, humanity finally realized that the Earth, in essence, is just a small ball, barely exceeding 12 thousand kilometers in diameter. The resources and possibilities for the development of the earth's energy were not endless either. It turned out that the power of terrestrial energy systems cannot grow indefinitely - otherwise the atmosphere may overheat, and all the consequences of this are still difficult to predict.
It is not surprising, therefore, that the thoughts of scientists turned to outer space: there is not only scope for deploying the most powerful energy systems, but also “gratuitous” energy sources. The first is, of course, the sun.
SPACE LIGHTING
A small fraction of solar radiation reaches the Earth's surface. But it can be increased with the help of space technology. For example, by mounting a sufficiently large reflector in near-Earth orbit. Such a mirror, of course, is primarily suitable for lighting; and there are still many remote places on Earth, devoid of electricity and roads for the transport of fuel.
The illumination and size of the light spot on the Earth's surface can be varied as needed by calculating all the parameters in advance: the height of the orbit, the area and orientation of the reflector, etc. The luminosity of the reflector can be made like that of the full moon, or it can be ten
times greater. Comparison with the Moon suggests naming such a satellite reflector Lunetta.
However, the author of this proposal, the well-known American scientist, astronautics theorist Krafft Ericke, believes that in many respects Lunetta will be more convenient than the real Moon. The main disadvantage of a natural satellite of the Earth is that the full moon shines in our sky for no more than 20% of the monthly cycle. And Lupetta is able to create an almost permanent full moon! (For this, of course, you will have to program the orientation of the reflector accordingly.)
According to Erique's calculations, to illuminate the densely populated urban areas of the Earth, it will be necessary to assemble several reflectors in orbit with a total luminosity of 40-80 PL (full moons). For areas of agricultural work and large construction projects, 15-30 times
the superiority of the Lunetta over the natural night star, and for new settlements in developing countries, 10-20 PL will suffice.
But how to make "cosmic lighting" continuous throughout the night? One of the solutions is to assemble a reflector in the so-called geostationary orbit: an artificial satellite, launched in the equatorial plane into a circular orbit with a radius of about 42,000 km, seems to hang motionlessly over a given point on the earth's surface, since the period of revolution of such a satellite is exactly equal to a day. 
The geostationary orbit is very convenient for illuminating the tropics and subtropical regions of the Earth. But what about the polar regions (where, by the way, artificial lighting is much more needed)? In this case, it is more convenient to use orbits with a high inclination (the inclination is the angle between the equatorial plane and the plane of the orbit) and with a radius that provides a period of revolution that is a multiple of a day. If a geostationary Lunetta needs one reflector, then for a semi-diurnal orbit, to provide eight hours of illumination, they will need two (offset by 90 ° in orbit), for an 8-hour orbit - three, etc. The dimensions of the reflector are determined depending on the height of the orbit and from the required illumination: for example, for a stationary Lunetta with a capacity of 80 submarines, a reflector with an area of 26 square kilometers will be required. For 1 submarine, only 0.22 square kilometers is enough, which requires a mirror diameter of 530 m. However, if we want to use cosmic lighting even on cloudy nights, when the sky above the bare is covered with a dense veil of clouds, then we will have to increase the mirror size by almost 10 once. At the same time, according to Erika, the area of the illuminated area on the Earth's surface will reach 88,000 square kilometers. In other words, one Lunetta can
to illuminate such a country as Portugal (where in 1975 the last annual congress of the International Federation of Astronautics was held, at which, among others, these problems were discussed). 
Structurally, Lunetta can be a rigid tubular frame covered with a metallized plastic film. Based on the technological level achievable by the 90s of our century, the weight of one square kilometer of Lunetta will be about 200-300 tons.
It is reasonable to ask: what will it all cost? According to Erike, the creation of such a space lamp will cost about 15 billion dollars. At first glance, the number seems huge. But remember that the Apollo program alone cost $25 billion. Considering that each square kilometer of Lunetta will save about 2 million tons of oil annually (which is burned today in thermal power plants to generate the electricity needed for lighting), that, in addition, a lot of metal and money spent today on building lighting electrical networks will be saved, which thanks to cosmic illumination, sowing and harvesting agricultural work will be doubled and the efficiency of the use of agricultural machines will increase, that the semi-annual polar night will disappear, then you can believe Erica, who believes that after 25-30 years of operation Lunetta will give a great economic effect.
However, another important question arises: will any harmful consequences of a multiple increase in night illumination be revealed over time? There is every reason to hope that no harm will come. The point is, first of all, that the natural light of the Sun, electromagnetic waves, to which everything on earth has adapted over billions of years of evolution, will be used for night illumination. In this sense, the growth in the power of various ground-based sources of the electromagnetic field is much more dangerous - radio stations, power grids, neon advertisements, radars, etc. Of course, it is possible that Lunetta will make life very difficult for some animals at first. But this problem is unlikely to become particularly acute. First, thanks to a noticeable intensification of agriculture, it will be possible to increase the area of reserves (where familiar natural conditions, including night darkness, will be preserved). Secondly, organisms will undoubtedly adapt to new
conditions. After all, animals and birds of the polar regions do not suffer from round-the-clock lighting during the polar day.
HEAT FROM SPACE
Reflected sunlight can be used not only for lighting, but also for heating selected areas of the earth's surface. The vast expanses of Siberia or Canada could produce much more grain if the summer there were lengthened and the average annual temperature increased by ten degrees. Increasing the density of sunlight (adding an artificial stream turned to the Earth by a reflector to the natural light flux of the Sun) is not only heating. It also encourages photosynthesis, increasing plant productivity. But it is precisely in the growth of the productivity of photosynthesis that the solution to the problem of protein deficiency hanging over humanity lies.
It has long been known that not all chemical reactions that involve the process of photosynthesis require lighting. Some of them continue in the dark, after the light has already been turned off. Thus, in addition to enhancing daylight illumination in agricultural areas with short, cold summers, short-term night illumination can also be applied to tropical countries in order to increase the productivity of photosynthesis there as well.
According to preliminary estimates, to stimulate plant growth, an additional luminous flux of about 20% of the total solar one is needed (for comparison: the intensity of illumination given by Lunetta is from 0.00001 to 0.0001 full solar). To achieve this intensity of reflected light, the area of the mirror must be increased many times over in comparison with the Lunetta. Krafft Erike calls such a reflector to enhance photosynthesis Soletta - from the Sun. If Soletta is mounted in a four-hour orbit, then to create 10% of the light flux of the full Sun (PS) on the Earth's surface, the mirror area must be made equal to 270 square kilometers. Further, the figures grow faster and faster: for 20% of the PS - 500 km2, for 40% of the PS - 1,100 km2, for 50% of the PS - 6,600 km2.
The minimum area on the Earth's surface illuminated from a four-hour orbit will be about 2,800 square kilometers. The number of Solettes for a four-hour exposure, respectively, will be: in a four-hour orbit - 3, in a six-hour orbit - 2 and in an eight-hour - 1.
It is assumed that each Soletta will be a "swarm" of reflectors, the light fluxes of which should be focused and superimposed on each other. Each individual reflector (“standard unit”) is assembled from standard elements up to 200 square kilometers in area. Standard elements are movable relative to each other and must be electronically oriented according to a given program in order to focus the light flux and direct it to a given point on the Earth.
Soletta will be serviced both from the Earth's surface with the help of a powerful aerospace transport system with a payload capacity of 1000-5000 tons (it is still difficult to imagine such systems today, but we are talking about the beginning of the next millennium), and from a special station in near-Earth orbit with a crew of 150-200 people, interorbital remote-controlled and manned vehicles.
This program, according to preliminary estimates, will cost from 30 to 60 billion dollars. Ericke's calculations convince of the expediency of the costs: only an increase in the productivity of agriculture will fully pay off the investment in 25-30 years. But more than just agriculture will benefit from Soletta. If you increase its power, all earthly technology will reach a new energy level. Erica named it like this:
TWO-STAR ECOLOGY
The fruits of this more powerful, as Erike calls it, ecological Soletta will go to posterity. And the generation of the 90s will have to start this business already. According to Ericke, it will be possible to talk about a two-star ecology when, to the natural light flux of the Sun falling on the Earth, an artificial one is added, which is about 80% of the natural one (the Earth, as it were, will acquire a second luminary comparable to the Sun). To do this, it would be necessary to assemble the Solette group in geostationary orbit with a total area of \u200b\u200bup to 66,000 square kilometers. As a result, on the Earth's surface, in a selected area of 100-150 thousand square kilometers, the intensity of the light flux at night will be 0.8 PS (in the daytime it will, of course, be 1.8 PS). On each clear night, this area will receive about 660 billion kilowatt-hours, which will provide more than 2E14 kW. h annually.
Where to put this abyss of energy? Probably, the descendants will find for it such an application that our imagination is not yet able to invent. (Oh, don't worry so much! S-F) But a lot can be imagined even now. Energy can be used to irrigate deserts, produce fresh water (and there is not enough of it now) and liquid hydrogen, which, apparently, will be an ideal fuel for high-speed aviation, aerospace systems, and perhaps for land transport. An abundance of energy will ensure the growth of industry and cities, the exploration of the ocean and space ...
OTHER IDEAS. A NEARER FUTURE
Cosmonautics can help the energy industry in the near future as well.
IDEA 1. With the development of nuclear energy, the problem of eliminating radioactive waste arises. Leaving them on Earth, to put it mildly, is undesirable. The best thing would be to throw them into space. But, of course, not haphazardly and not anywhere: it would be good to dump them at some specific points in space so that these points can be marked in red on space maps and the paths of ships can be laid away from them. Fortunately, such points in space exist - these are libration points (or Lagrange points), they are also in the Earth-Moon system and in the Sun-Jupiter system. As is known, at two of the five Lagrange points the space object will be in a state of stable equilibrium, maintaining the initial distances from the main bodies of the system. Thus, astronautics can ensure the development
nuclear energy by removing its waste.
IDEA 2. You can try to develop nuclear power in space by assembling reactors in near-Earth orbits and transferring energy to Earth in any available way (more on that below). This approach is attractive because the excess heat will not overheat the atmosphere, but will be dissipated in outer space. Not-
The location of the precise librations in the "Earth-Moon" system. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 - libration points (Lagrange points). At points 1, 2 and 3 the object is in unstable equilibrium, and at points 4 and 5 it is in stable equilibrium.
gravity will make it possible to assemble rather bulky structures in orbits, which, perhaps, would not have been possible to assemble on Earth at all. The problem of waste disposal, however, will remain here, and will have to be solved by resorting to idea No. 1.
IDEA 3rd. With the help of satellites, especially geostationary satellites, it is convenient to relay energy from one point of the globe to another. At the same time, metal is saved, which would go to the construction of ground distribution networks.
IDEA 4th. Solar energy can be converted into other forms: ground-based solar installations have long existed. But they are low-powered and entirely dependent on the vagaries of the weather (not to mention the fact that they do not work at night). In space - also for a relatively long time - solar panels are working properly, converting light into electricity. Microwave generators already exist that convert electric current into microwave radiation. Microwave radiation is easily focused into a "power beam", which is not afraid of atmospheric interference - rain, snow, fog - and which itself
practically does not affect the atmosphere (and this, as already mentioned, is extremely important).
Devices for receiving microwave energy - half-wave dipole antennas and solid-state diodes that convert microwaves to direct current, have also been developed for a long time.
What remains? Assemble a support platform in geostationary orbit and place solar panels, microwave generators and a transmitting antenna on it. On Earth, accordingly, it is necessary to mount a receiving antenna, and the energy flow (which can be the source of both the Sun and a nuclear reactor) will flow from space to the Earth's surface. Or (see idea No. 3) from a ground power station through space to consumers at another point on the planet.
Space vacuum will ensure high efficiency of energy generation and transmission; receiving dipole converters also have good performance, so the efficiency of such a power system
solar power plant on satellite.
scheme of microwave technology of energy transfer to the Earth. 1 - conversion into electromagnetic energy of high frequency, 2 - transmitting
antenna, 3—microwave power beam, 4—receiving antenna on Earth, 5—conversion of microwave radiation into direct current.
promises to be very high. No wonder three American firms under contract with NASA in 1974 began to develop it. According to the original design, a transmitting antenna with a diameter of about 1 km will weigh about 6000 tons. The diameter of the ground antenna will be 10 times larger. Defined and
the optimal frequency at which atmospheric interference to the power beam will be minimal is 2.5 gigahertz. According to the authors of the project, the operation of the system can begin around 1990.
It is obvious that the creation and operation of even the simplest space power system is hardly possible on the basis of disposable launch vehicles used today. Therefore, the question arose of creating maneuverable reusable transport systems for delivering cargo from the Earth to orbits and back. The first step along this path, taken in the United States, is the development of the Space Shuttle system (see Science and Life
No. 11, 1974). However, to create Soletta, one cannot do without aerospace transport systems (see "Science and Life" No. 8,
1970). But this is a topic for a special discussion.
